Addressing Racial Inequities in Social Services

Addressing Social Services and Racial Inequities: Tools for Change

clock
6 min read
casebook logo icon
By
Casebook PBC

Table of Contents

Racial inequities in social services are lived realities for marginalized communities. From unequal access to healthcare to systemic biases in child welfare, these disparities shape outcomes for generations.

But as a social worker, you don’t have to accept this status quo. You can drive meaningful change by understanding the roots of these social services racial inequity and adopting practical tools.

Understanding Structural Inequities

Let’s break down how decades of exclusionary policies and everyday institutional practices keep these inequities alive.

Historical Context of Racial Discrimination

Today’s global racial discrimination in social services didn’t appear out of nowhere. They’re rooted in policies designed to exclude.

Take redlining, the 1930s practice that literally drew lines around Black neighborhoods to deny home loans. This created modern-day “opportunity deserts” where schools and clinics remain underfunded.

Or consider the G.I. Bill, which gave white veterans pathways to homeownership and college while shutting out Black servicemembers.

Even supposedly neutral systems reflect social political and racial attitudes and human services aren’t immune. Let’s take the recent report about New York’s Administration for Children’s Services (ACS). The study found that despite making up only 23% of NYC’s population, Black children account for 38% of family regulation reports and 52% of emergency removals from homes.

The Role of Systemic Racism in Social Services

In healthcare, Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act reduced racial coverage gaps. But, low-income minorities still face higher uninsured rates than their white counterparts.

Similarly, children and family services workers report Black parents are often presumed “incompetent,” while white families receive more support.

Social Determinants of Health

Choices alone do not shape your client’s health. It’s often also molded by zip codes, income levels, and systemic barriers.

Let’s understand how social determinants of health (SDOH) create unequal playing fields and why addressing them is key to equity.

Definition and Importance

SDOH are the conditions where people live, work, and grow. The CDC identifies five domains:

  • Economic stability
  • Education access
  • Healthcare access
  • Neighborhood and built environments
  • Social and community context

These social factors account for up to 50% of health outcomes, often outweighing medical care.

For example, a child in a high-poverty neighborhood might face asthma triggers like mold in aging housing and pollution from nearby highways. These are factors often far beyond individual control.

So, ignoring SDOH means ignoring the root causes of racial and ethnic disparities.

Impact on Marginalized Communities

Ethnic minority populations and those in concentrated poverty face the harshest SDOH effects.

For instance, Black and Hispanic adults are more likely than white adults to experience food insecurity, housing instability, and lack of transportation.

Similarly, in neighborhoods with residential segregation, more Black children develop asthma than their white counterparts. It’s double the rate of white children due to pollution and poor housing conditions.

All these aren’t isolated issues. They’re interlinked barriers that trap families in cycles of poor health.

Racial Disparities in Health Care Access

When it comes to health care, your zip code shouldn’t determine your life expectancy. But for many, systemic barriers and policy gaps often make it a harsh reality.

Challenges Faced by African Americans

Can you imagine your clients living in a state where lawmakers refuse federal funds to expand Medicaid, leaving thousands uninsured?

In South Carolina, Mississippi, and Alabama, states with large Black populations, this policy choice traps African Americans in a “coverage gap.”

Even with coverage, Black mothers face staggering risks. They’re about 2.6 times more likely to die from pregnancy-related complications than non-Hispanic white women. And Southern states report rates as high as 58.1 deaths per 100,000 pregnancies.

Transportation deserts, medical distrust, and racial bias compound these gaps.

Effects of the Affordable Care Act

The ACA brought progress, but it’s uneven.

Medicaid expansion helped reduce uninsured rates for Black Americans by nearly 10% nationally, yet millions still fall into the coverage gap in non-expansion states.

In expansion states like California, Black-white disparities in access to primary care narrowed, but Southern states lag behind.

Broader Implications of Racial Inequity

Racial inequities don’t stop at healthcare or education. They ripple through employment, housing, and the very neighborhoods where people live.

Employment Disparities

Even in a strong job market, you’ll find Black workers facing stubborn gaps. As of January 2025, Black worker unemployment hovered at 6.1%, nearly double the 3.6% rate for white workers.

Another National Skills Coalition study revealed Black college graduates are more likely than white peers to be underemployed in low-wage roles like food service or retail.

Hiring bias persists, too: identical resumes with “Black-sounding” names still receive 50% fewer callbacks than those with “white-sounding” names.

Housing Inequities

A person’s ability to build wealth often starts with homeownership. But redlining’s legacy still locks out communities of color. As of the latest available data, only 45% of Black families own homes compared to 74% of white families, a gap rooted in decades of discriminatory lending.

Project 2025’s proposed cuts to Section 8 vouchers and down-payment assistance could widen this divide.

Even when Black families secure housing, they’re often steered toward areas marked by educational inequity and pollution risks, perpetuating health and wealth gaps.

Built Environment and Its Influence

Where you live shapes how long you live.

Formerly redlined neighborhoods often have fewer parks and grocery stores than non-redlined areas. These could adversely affect health and quality of life.

For instance, Baltimore’s childhood asthma rate of 20% is nearly double the national average. And it’s often the Black children in historically redlined areas facing adverse health effects due to poverty, poor housing, and environmental hazards.

Targeted Interventions and Reforms

You’ve seen how systemic inequities play out. Now, let’s explore actionable solutions.

Importance of Policy Changes

Policy changes by public sector agencies are often the core power enabling change.

Take Medicaid expansion. States like California reduced racial coverage gaps after adopting it, while non-expansion states like Alabama left 1.6 million adults uninsured.

Similarly, local initiatives like Charlottesville City Council’s $4 million equity package are also hugely effective. In this case, it funded Black-owned businesses and affordable housing, directly countering redlining’s legacy.

Community Engagement Strategies

Montgomery County’s Racial Equity and Social Justice Act (RESJ) codified “nothing about us without us.” It required Black, Indigenous, and Other People of Color (BIPOC) community members to co-design programs like eviction prevention.

All this proves that community outreach works. And tools like Casebook make it even easier to implement targeted interventions.

Data-Driven Approaches to Addressing Inequity

You can’t fix what you don’t measure. Let’s understand how analytics can uncover hidden disparities and guide smarter interventions.

Utilizing Data for Better Outcomes

Think of spotting a gap in mental health referrals for Black youth that your team never noticed. Disaggregated data analysis makes this possible.

For instance, initiatives like Broward Data Collaborative (BDC) have worked to reduce racial disparities in foster placements by cross-referencing data from schools, courts, and healthcare systems.

You can even leverage tools like Casebook for better outcomes and streamlined workflow. Casebook’s analytics dashboard, for instance, helps social workers flag cases where individuals and families of color face such disparities — enabling real-time adjustments.

Assessing Community Needs

Data is actionable when it’s grounded in community voice.

Take the Metro Atlanta Racial Equity Atlas (MAREA). It layers census data with resident surveys to map food deserts and underfunded schools, guiding targeted investments.

The lesson? Data works best when it’s co-created, not extracted.

Pathways Towards Health Equity

Data reveal gaps. But lasting health equity requires teamwork and systems built to endure.

Collaborative Efforts for Change

Think of a hospital partnering with a local food bank to tackle diabetes in Black neighborhoods. That’s the power of cross-sector collaboration.

The National Maternal and Child Health Workforce Development Center found that aligning healthcare, housing, and education reduces disparities faster than siloed efforts.

Meanwhile, California’s Building Healthy Communities initiative united schools, clinics, and advocates to expand Medicaid coverage for undocumented residents.

These efforts succeed because they center community voice.

Sustainable Practices in Social Services

Sustainable practices in social services mean building systems that outlive temporary fixes while centering equity. Think beyond “checklists” because truly sustainable practices are about creating structures that adapt to shifting community needs.

You can integrate sustainability by:

  • Embedding equity metrics into performance reviews, like tracking referral rates for communities of color.
  • Partnering with grassroots groups, such as the Black Mothers Breastfeeding Association, to co-design programs that address systemic gaps in health support.
  • Leveraging tools like Casebook’s reporting dashboards to spot service deserts in real time, enabling proactive adjustments instead of reactive fixes.

These are just a few examples. You can implement even better practices by actually analyzing your data analysis reports, clients, local neighborhoods, and other criteria.

FAQs

Which is the most extreme system of social inequality?

Apartheid in South Africa and caste systems in India represent extreme systems of social inequality, legally enforcing racial or hereditary hierarchies.

How does social stratification lead to social inequality?

Stratification assigns power and resources unequally based on race or class. It thus limits marginalized groups’ access to housing, education, and healthcare.

What are the two major social sources of global inequality?

Structural racism and exploitative economic policies are the two primary global drivers of social inequality.

Can social inequality be eliminated?

While complete elimination is difficult, you can significantly reduce it through policy reforms and systemic changes.

How can education reduce social inequality?

Education provides skills, knowledge, and opportunities that enable social mobility and help break intergenerational cycles of poverty.

casebook logo icon
Casebook PBC
Casebook PBC
share this page
Stay Informed.
Sign-up to receive guides, resources, and updates.